How Leaders Can Use Feedback to Manage Shame, Guilt

A vice president misses a deadline and spends the week avoiding her team, convinced she is not cut out for the role. A second vice president misses the same deadline, feels sick about the specific decision that caused it, apologizes and fixes the process. Both feel bad about the same failure. Only one of them recovers.

The difference is not willpower or resilience training. It is the difference between shame and guilt, two states neuroscience treats as genuinely separate rather than two words for the same discomfort. Most leadership advice on handling failure does not make that distinction, which may be why so much of it does not work.

Two moral emotions, built for different jobs

Shame and guilt both belong to what researchers classify as self-conscious moral emotions, alongside embarrassment and pride: states that require a sense of self and an internalized awareness of social norms, rather than emotions triggered by an outside stimulus. Within that family, the two split in opposite directions. Shame is the personal one, a global judgment about the self. Guilt is the social one, tied to having broken a norm against another person, and organized around repairing that harm, whether the repair is aimed at the other person or at restoring one's own sense of having done right.

Please select this link to read the complete article from SmartBrief.